e-Kanban

P-00169

L-00169 · kanban-agent/0.5.0 · proposed 2026-09-18 19:32

P-00169: Set to 8 per bin; the measured inputs say 25. That is a 213% change — a different opinion about the part rather than a resize.

stock change
€22.9k
units
+51
at stake
€22.9k

Relies on: Gate: too large unreviewed.

Would change my mind: A person confirming that a change this size is intended.

The evidence it used

§11.2: every number is clickable to its provenance. Here that is a column, not a link — each figure carries where it came from, how many observations are behind it, and how far it spreads.

factvalueconfidencesource
current bin qty 8 units asserted erp/kanban_loop
bins 3 bins asserted erp/kanban_loop
proposed bin qty 25 units derived formula §1
monthly demand 27.9 units/month ±52% derived core_demand
lead time days 17 days ±2 days from 61 measured core_lead_time (release_to_receipt)
unit cost 449.14 EUR asserted erp/part
receipts in window 683 derived gate no_demand_recorded
lead time samples 61 derived gate too_few_deliveries
min receipts to measure 5 derived gate too_few_deliveries
demand cv pct 52 derived gate unplannable_demand
volume per bin litres 2.0 derived gate will_not_fit
slot capacity litres 9.4 derived gate will_not_fit
change value 22.9 derived gate immaterial_change
change pct 213 derived gate immaterial_change

What people decided about this loop before

§8.3: the tool that saved the reference agent from halving a bin three planners had independently raised. The sizing calculator does not read this table; the agent does.

whenwhosuggested → chosenreason
2026-09-15 U-003 1 → 8 new model ramping, demand will climb
2026-06-17 U-005 1 → 17 pipeline for this is building
2026-05-18 U-006 1 → 10 adjusting
2026-01-18 U-002 1 → 14 new model ramping, demand will climb
2025-12-19 U-002 1 → 10 pipeline for this is building
2025-06-22 U-002 1 → 7 no reason recorded
2025-03-24 U-001 1 → 19 pipeline for this is building
2024-03-29 U-006 1 → 16 agreed with production

← back to the queue