e-Kanban

P-00176

L-00176 · kanban-agent/0.5.0 · proposed 2026-09-18 19:32

P-00176: Set to 21 per bin; the measured inputs say 50. That is a 138% change — a different opinion about the part rather than a resize.

stock change
€74.2k
units
+87
at stake
€74.2k

Relies on: Gate: too large unreviewed.

Would change my mind: A person confirming that a change this size is intended.

The evidence it used

§11.2: every number is clickable to its provenance. Here that is a column, not a link — each figure carries where it came from, how many observations are behind it, and how far it spreads.

factvalueconfidencesource
current bin qty 21 units asserted erp/kanban_loop
bins 3 bins asserted erp/kanban_loop
proposed bin qty 50 units derived formula §1
monthly demand 6.3 units/month ±36% derived core_demand
lead time days 69 days ±57 days from 9 measured core_lead_time (release_to_receipt)
unit cost 852.30 EUR asserted erp/part
receipts in window 150 derived gate no_demand_recorded
lead time samples 9 derived gate too_few_deliveries
min receipts to measure 5 derived gate too_few_deliveries
demand cv pct 36 derived gate unplannable_demand
volume per bin litres 0.0 derived gate will_not_fit
slot capacity litres unknown derived gate will_not_fit
change value 74.2 derived gate immaterial_change
change pct 138 derived gate immaterial_change

What people decided about this loop before

§8.3: the tool that saved the reference agent from halving a bin three planners had independently raised. The sizing calculator does not read this table; the agent does.

whenwhosuggested → chosenreason
2026-03-19 U-004 4 → 21 promised dates unreliable, adding buffer
2026-01-18 U-002 5 → 17 no reason recorded
2025-08-21 U-006 6 → 14 agreed with production
2025-03-24 U-003 6 → 26 as discussed
2024-09-25 U-002 5 → 34 changed per review
2024-08-26 U-006 5 → 23 no reason recorded
2024-03-29 U-005 2 → 18 adjusting
2024-01-29 U-003 1 → 13 no reason recorded

← back to the queue