e-Kanban

P-00206

L-00206 · kanban-agent/0.5.0 · proposed 2026-09-18 19:32

P-00206: Set to 57 per bin; the measured inputs say 104. That is a 82% change — a different opinion about the part rather than a resize.

stock change
€26.0k
units
+141
at stake
€26.0k

Relies on: Gate: too large unreviewed.

Would change my mind: A person confirming that a change this size is intended.

The evidence it used

§11.2: every number is clickable to its provenance. Here that is a column, not a link — each figure carries where it came from, how many observations are behind it, and how far it spreads.

factvalueconfidencesource
current bin qty 57 units asserted erp/kanban_loop
bins 3 bins asserted erp/kanban_loop
proposed bin qty 104 units derived formula §1
monthly demand 27.7 units/month ±53% derived core_demand
lead time days 157 days ±10 days from 7 measured core_lead_time (release_to_receipt)
unit cost 184.22 EUR asserted erp/part
receipts in window 310 derived gate no_demand_recorded
lead time samples 7 derived gate too_few_deliveries
min receipts to measure 5 derived gate too_few_deliveries
demand cv pct 53 derived gate unplannable_demand
volume per bin litres 29.2 derived gate will_not_fit
slot capacity litres 51.6 derived gate will_not_fit
change value 26.0 derived gate immaterial_change
change pct 82 derived gate immaterial_change

What people decided about this loop before

§8.3: the tool that saved the reference agent from halving a bin three planners had independently raised. The sizing calculator does not read this table; the agent does.

whenwhosuggested → chosenreason
2026-09-15 U-002 20 → 57 no reason recorded
2026-08-16 U-006 21 → 21 no reason recorded
2026-05-18 U-006 27 → 53 adjusting
2025-12-19 U-006 17 → 90 takes 4 months to replace, sizing up
2025-10-20 U-006 17 → 29 no reason recorded
2025-02-22 U-001 23 → 48 no reason recorded
2025-01-23 U-005 24 → 76 no reason recorded
2024-12-24 U-003 19 → 55 adjusting

← back to the queue